<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Impact of the iPod Touch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blazenewmedia.com/articles/the-impact-of-the-ipod-touch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blazenewmedia.com/articles/the-impact-of-the-ipod-touch/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 18:59:58 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Avasilcai Daniel</title>
		<link>http://blazenewmedia.com/articles/the-impact-of-the-ipod-touch/comment-page-1/#comment-519</link>
		<dc:creator>Avasilcai Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 08:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blazenewmedia.com/beta/blog/uncategorized/the-impact-of-the-ipod-touch/#comment-519</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I thought that  resolution 800xsomething will disappear but i was wrong, will emerge on the market new devices that will similar resolution, one of this is the iphone. What i hate on this devices(i mean ipod touch &amp;iphone) for example that they really have a good os (mac os x adapted mobile) but you can not have the preview app (adapted), text edit(adapted) so you must read pdf, doc file on your email, and is not all, you can not read pdf larger than 10mb, so i am asking my self for what all this 8gigs memory? I will buy this especially for reading ebooks on it. They are too limited on music &amp; video , &amp; email reading. In my opinion this is only a marketing, they do not want  to develop other useful app on it, they want to sell content on itunes store.  I don&#8217;t buy a device like this only to navigate with it. How many sites are real mobile ready? They got to sell millions to convince developers, i don&#8217;t mean only digg&amp;facebook, i mean e banking sites, e commerce, where you can buy airplane tickets or things like this. Will see&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought that  resolution 800xsomething will disappear but i was wrong, will emerge on the market new devices that will similar resolution, one of this is the iphone. What i hate on this devices(i mean ipod touch &#38;iphone) for example that they really have a good os (mac os x adapted mobile) but you can not have the preview app (adapted), text edit(adapted) so you must read pdf, doc file on your email, and is not all, you can not read pdf larger than 10mb, so i am asking my self for what all this 8gigs memory? I will buy this especially for reading ebooks on it. They are too limited on music &#38; video , &#38; email reading. In my opinion this is only a marketing, they do not want  to develop other useful app on it, they want to sell content on itunes store.  I don&#8217;t buy a device like this only to navigate with it. How many sites are real mobile ready? They got to sell millions to convince developers, i don&#8217;t mean only digg&#38;facebook, i mean e banking sites, e commerce, where you can buy airplane tickets or things like this. Will see&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill W.</title>
		<link>http://blazenewmedia.com/articles/the-impact-of-the-ipod-touch/comment-page-1/#comment-449</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 10:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blazenewmedia.com/beta/blog/uncategorized/the-impact-of-the-ipod-touch/#comment-449</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I had a thought. When the iPhone came out, everyone started making iPhone compatible websites like “iphone.somedomain.com”. But, now that mobile Safari is appearing in devices like iPodTouch, it doesn’t make sense for people to name their domains that way.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What exactly do you name the iPhone/iTouch/iFutureDevice subdomains then?? Somebody really needs to come up with a better convention for mobile Safari URLs.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a thought. When the iPhone came out, everyone started making iPhone compatible websites like “iphone.somedomain.com”. But, now that mobile Safari is appearing in devices like iPodTouch, it doesn’t make sense for people to name their domains that way.</p>
<p>What exactly do you name the iPhone/iTouch/iFutureDevice subdomains then?? Somebody really needs to come up with a better convention for mobile Safari URLs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://blazenewmedia.com/articles/the-impact-of-the-ipod-touch/comment-page-1/#comment-448</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 02:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blazenewmedia.com/beta/blog/uncategorized/the-impact-of-the-ipod-touch/#comment-448</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Although Mobile Safari use is still considerably low (relative to the competition), I think we’ll see more iPod Touch / iPhone friendly web interfaces.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What I hope that developers keep in mind is that Mobile Safari does a fantastic job rendering standard web pages [especially over Wifi]. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Devs, make sure to provide visitors with an option to view pages in their full glory!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although Mobile Safari use is still considerably low (relative to the competition), I think we’ll see more iPod Touch / iPhone friendly web interfaces.</p>
<p>What I hope that developers keep in mind is that Mobile Safari does a fantastic job rendering standard web pages [especially over Wifi]. </p>
<p>Devs, make sure to provide visitors with an option to view pages in their full glory!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
